Engineering Note
SSE vs WebSockets for Real-time Product Workflows
A pragmatic framework for choosing SSE or WebSockets based on workflow shape, operational cost, and failure behavior.
- Realtime Systems
- SSE
- WebSockets
Start from workflow direction
If most updates are server-to-client streams, SSE is often simpler and more stable. If you need full duplex interaction with low-latency bidirectional state, WebSockets may be the right fit.
Operational tradeoffs
SSE usually wins on simplicity:
- easier infrastructure behavior through HTTP semantics
- simpler reconnect handling
- lower coordination overhead for many dashboard-style experiences
WebSockets win when interaction semantics require it, but they introduce more state and operational complexity.
Practical decision rule
Pick SSE by default for status updates, progress streams, and event timelines. Move to WebSockets only when your product behavior truly needs two-way session semantics.
Common mistake
Teams often choose WebSockets because it feels more powerful, then spend weeks maintaining connection edge cases they did not actually need.
Architecture Engagement
Need help applying this in a live product?
I work with teams on architecture decisions and delivery plans for backend-heavy and AI-assisted systems.